| |
|
It is interesting to think of how the relationship between
a work of art and its frame, or its context, has evolved. If we take a look
back there was a time when the selection of a frame (the physical frame
of a bi-dimensional work) and the mounting was fundamental for the painter
or for the collector. Or we may recall how the noblemen hired artists to
design pictures for a specific room in their houses, for the library, for
the smoking or the dining room, or even for the garden. On the other hand,
it is true that art has moved several times through history, from caves
to temples, to the interior of noble residencies, and from there to museums,
galleries and urban spaces.
Although this relationship frame-work has existed from the moment in which
man started producing art (let’s recall the koan, “How can you
describe the sound of a falling tree if there is nobody to listen to it?”),
the discussion about this is much more recent. It might have been initiated
by the invention of the ready-made. From the moment that the criteria expanded
to the point of which any object may be categorized as an artwork by the
artist´s decision, it became necessary to define the elements of this
simple choice for it to have a response in the art world.
In recent years, the author Nicolás Bourriaud has spoken about this
problem in terms of the Relational Aesthetics, which described broadly,
is the theory of an art that works with the relationship artwork-audience-context.
A key example is the work of the artist Rirkrit Tiravanija, which seeks
for its audience to inhabit his installations. Through windows and mirrors
they look at themselves as central elements of the piece.
In the case of the piece by Katrin Korfmann that I saw in a street kiosk
nearby the old academy of arts in West Berlin, the context had been bared.
Using white pieces of forex in precise shapes and sizes, the artist had
covered every object that was on sale at the shop. The image looked like
a blue print, as the one that could have been drawn by the person who was
planning which articles would be sold and the organization of them in the
space of the shop. We don´t know what labels or types of cigarettes
are on sale, but we can see the furniture destined for these products. We
can see the silhouettes of the clothes hanging on their hangers, but we
don´t know if the clothes have the colour or design that is fashionable
in that precise moment. We see that there are posters hanging on the windows
without knowing what they are advertising. We can see where the newspapers
should be but we don’t know what the headlines are.
Although the mystery I am describing is actually a fantasy, the truth is
that anyone that had spent enough time in the city in which the kiosk is
located (that is similar to other cities) knows the main cigarette brands
sold in town, the way most people dress, and even the brief advertising
campaigns that regularly inundate the streets. We can play mentally with
our memory putting the missing images of the products that are covered in
white forex, aided by all the trivial information that thanks to advertisement
occupies space in our heads, making a commercial kiosk the most predictable
place in the world. The temporal emptiness of the objects makes evident
their daily presence.
The same artist produced a series of photographs that may be read in a similar
manner. They are also images in which she takes the content out of its context.
The series is called Artspaces and consists of a collection of photographs
taken in show rooms. By digital edition, Katrin took out the works exhibited,
baring the white walls that now work as the background of the visitors’
portrait. These visitors are the ones who listen to the tree falling, and
without the presence of a tree our attention focuses on their act of listening.
The peculiar image of these characters looking at nothing with attention
is more than just ironic. The people seem to have gone to the gallery to
experience some kind of meditative trance observing the white walls. And
at the same time the piece works inside a permanent cycle in which the artist
watches the watchers who will later watch her photographic works and themselves
through them. |
|